We have about 30 instances of the typo/variant spelling 'writeable',
and over 500 of the more common 'writable'. Standardize on the
latter.
Change produced with:
sed -i -e 's/\([Ww][Rr][Ii][Tt]\)[Ee]\([Aa][Bb][Ll][Ee]\)/\1\2/g' $(git grep -il writeable)
and then hand-undoing the instance in linux-headers/linux/kvm.h.
Most of these changes are in comments or documentation; the
exceptions are:
* a local variable in accel/hvf/hvf-accel-ops.c
* a local variable in accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
* the PMCR_WRITABLE_MASK macro in target/arm/internals.h
* the EPT_VIOLATION_GPA_WRITABLE macro in target/i386/hvf/vmcs.h
(which is never used anywhere)
* the AR_TYPE_WRITABLE_MASK macro in target/i386/hvf/vmx.h
(which is never used anywhere)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Message-id: 20220505095015.2714666-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update the various GIC ID and feature registers for GICv4:
* PIDR2 [7:4] is the GIC architecture revision
* GICD_TYPER.DVIS is 1 to indicate direct vLPI injection support
* GICR_TYPER.VLPIS is 1 to indicate redistributor support for vLPIs
* GITS_TYPER.VIRTUAL is 1 to indicate vLPI support
* GITS_TYPER.VMOVP is 1 to indicate that our VMOVP implementation
handles cross-ITS synchronization for the guest
* ICH_VTR_EL2.nV4 is 0 to indicate direct vLPI injection support
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-38-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We use the common function gicv3_idreg() to supply the CoreSight ID
register values for the GICv3 for the copies of these ID registers in
the distributor, redistributor and ITS register frames. This isn't
quite correct, because while most of the register values are the
same, the PIDR0 value should vary to indicate which of these three
frames it is. (You can see this and also the correct values of these
PIDR0 registers by looking at the GIC-600 or GIC-700 TRMs, for
example.)
Make gicv3_idreg() take an extra argument for the PIDR0 value.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Quoting Peter Maydell:
These MEMTX_* aren't from the memory transaction API functions;
they're just being used by gicd_readl() and friends as a way to
indicate a success/failure so that the actual MemoryRegionOps
read/write fns like gicv3_dist_read() can log a guest error.
Arguably this is a bit of a misuse of the MEMTX_* constants and
perhaps we should have gicd_readl etc return a bool instead.
Follow his suggestion and replace the MEMTX_* constants by
boolean values, simplifying a bit the gicv3_dist_read() /
gicv3_dist_write() handlers.
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210826180704.2131949-3-philmd@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
QEMU load/store API (docs/devel/loads-stores.rst) uses the 'q'
suffix for 64-bit accesses. Rename the current 'll' suffix to
have the GIC dist accessors better match the rest of the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20210826180704.2131949-2-philmd@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The GICv3 specification says that the GICD_TYPER.SecurityExtn bit
is RAZ if GICD_CTLR.DS is 1. We were incorrectly making it RAZ
if the security extension is unsupported. "Security extension
unsupported" always implies GICD_CTLR.DS == 1, but the guest can
also set DS on a GIC which does support the security extension.
Fix the condition to correctly check the GICD_CTLR.DS bit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190524124248.28394-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
When either GICD_IPRIORITYR or GICR_IPRIORITYR is read as a 32-bit
register, the post left-shift operator in the for loop causes an
extra shift after the least significant byte has been placed.
The 32-bit value actually returned is therefore the expected value
shifted left by 8 bits.
Signed-off-by: Amol Surati <suratiamol@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20180614054857.26248-1-suratiamol@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
