Accessing EL0-accessible Debug Communication Channel (DCC) registers in
user mode emulation is currently enabled. However, it does not match
Linux behavior as Linux sets MDSCR_EL1.TDCC on startup to disable EL0
access to DCC (see __cpu_setup() in arch/arm64/mm/proc.S).
This patch fixes access_tdcc() to check MDSCR_EL1.TDCC for EL0 and sets
MDSCR_EL1.TDCC for user mode emulation to match Linux.
Signed-off-by: Zhuojia Shen <chaosdefinition@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: DS7PR12MB630905198DD8E69F6817544CAC4EA@DS7PR12MB6309.namprd12.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The next few patches will move helpers under CONFIG_TCG. We'd prefer
to keep the debug helpers and debug registers close together, so
rearrange the file a bit to be able to wrap the helpers with a TCG
ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
FEAT_FGT also implements an extra trap bit in the MDCR_EL2 and
MDCR_EL3 registers: bit TDCC enables trapping of use of the Debug
Comms Channel registers OSDTRRX_EL1, OSDTRTX_EL1, MDCCSR_EL0,
MDCCINT_EL0, DBGDTR_EL0, DBGDTRRX_EL0 and DBGDTRTX_EL0 (and their
AArch32 equivalents). This trapping is independent of whether
fine-grained traps are enabled or not.
Implement these extra traps. (We don't implement DBGDTR_EL0,
DBGDTRRX_EL0 and DBGDTRTX_EL0.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Message-id: 20230130182459.3309057-23-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Message-id: 20230127175507.2895013-23-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Qemu doesn't implement Debug Communication Channel, as well as the rest
of external debug interface. However, Microsoft Hyper-V in tries to
access some of those registers during an EL2 context switch.
Since there is no architectural way to not advertise support for external
debug, provide RAZ/WI stubs for OSDTRRX_EL1, OSDTRTX_EL1 and OSECCR_EL1
registers in the same way the rest of DCM is currently done. Do account
for access traps though with access_tda.
Signed-off-by: Evgeny Iakovlev <eiakovlev@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20230120155929.32384-3-eiakovlev@linux.microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Change the representation of the TCR_EL* registers in the CPU state
struct from struct TCR to uint64_t. This allows us to drop the
custom vmsa_ttbcr_raw_write() function, moving the "enforce RES0"
checks to their more usual location in the writefn
vmsa_ttbcr_write(). We also don't need the resetfn any more.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220714132303.1287193-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The architecture defines the OS DoubleLock as a register which
(similarly to the OS Lock) suppresses debug events for use in CPU
powerdown sequences. This functionality is required in Arm v7 and
v8.0; from v8.2 it becomes optional and in v9 it must not be
implemented.
Currently in QEMU we implement the OSDLR_EL1 register as a NOP. This
is wrong both for the "feature implemented" and the "feature not
implemented" cases: if the feature is implemented then the DLK bit
should read as written and cause suppression of debug exceptions, and
if it is not implemented then the bit must be RAZ/WI.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Starting with v7 of the debug architecture, there are three extra
ID registers that add information on top of that provided in
DBGDIDR. These are DBGDEVID, DBGDEVID1 and DBGDEVID2. In the
v7 debug architecture, DBGDEVID is optional, present only of
DBGDIDR.DEVID_imp is set. In v7.1 all three must be present.
Implement the missing registers. Note that we only need to set the
values in the ARMISARegisters struct for the CPUs Cortex-A7, A15,
A53, A57 and A72 (plus the 32-bit 'max' which uses the Cortex-A53
values): earlier CPUs didn't implement v7 of the architecture, and
our other 64-bit CPUs (Cortex-A76, Neoverse-N1 and A64fx) don't have
AArch32 support at EL1.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220630194116.3438513-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The "OS Lock" in the Arm debug architecture is a way for software
to suppress debug exceptions while it is trying to power down
a CPU and save the state of the breakpoint and watchpoint
registers. In QEMU we implemented the support for writing
the OS Lock bit via OSLAR_EL1 and reading it via OSLSR_EL1,
but didn't implement the actual behaviour.
The required behaviour with the OS Lock set is:
* debug exceptions (apart from BKPT insns) are suppressed
* some MDSCR_EL1 bits allow write access to the corresponding
EDSCR external debug status register that they shadow
(we can ignore this because we don't implement external debug)
* similarly with the OSECCR_EL1 which shadows the EDECCR
(but we don't implement OSECCR_EL1 anyway)
Implement the missing behaviour of suppressing debug
exceptions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220630194116.3438513-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The target/arm/helper.c file is very long and is a grabbag of all
kinds of functionality. We have already a debug_helper.c which has
code for implementing architectural debug. Move the code which
defines the debug-related system registers out to this file also.
This affects the define_debug_regs() function and the various
functions and arrays which are used only by it.
The functions raw_write() and arm_mdcr_el2_eff() and
define_debug_regs() now need to be global rather than local to
helper.c; everything else is pure code movement.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220630194116.3438513-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Move the computation from gen_swstep_exception into a helper.
This fixes a bug when:
- MDSCR_EL1.KDE == 1 to enable debug exceptions within EL_D itself
- we singlestep an ERET from EL_D to some lower EL
Previously we were computing 'same el' based on the EL which
executed the ERET instruction, whereas it ought to be computed
based on the EL to which ERET returned. This happens naturally
with the new helper, which runs after EL has been changed.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220609202901.1177572-14-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reuse the code at the bottom of helper_check_breakpoints,
which is what we currently call from *_tr_breakpoint_check.
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
The AArch32 DBGDIDR defines properties like the number of
breakpoints, watchpoints and context-matching comparators. On an
AArch64 CPU, the register may not even exist if AArch32 is not
supported at EL1.
Currently we hard-code use of DBGDIDR to identify the number of
breakpoints etc; this works for all our TCG CPUs, but will break if
we ever add an AArch64-only CPU. We also have an assert() that the
AArch32 and AArch64 registers match, which currently works only by
luck for KVM because we don't populate either of these ID registers
from the KVM vCPU and so they are both zero.
Clean this up so we have functions for finding the number
of breakpoints, watchpoints and context comparators which look
in the appropriate ID register.
This allows us to drop the "check that AArch64 and AArch32 agree
on the number of breakpoints etc" asserts:
* we no longer look at the AArch32 versions unless that's the
right place to be looking
* it's valid to have a CPU (eg AArch64-only) where they don't match
* we shouldn't have been asserting the validity of ID registers
in a codepath used with KVM anyway
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org