The m25p80 test depends on the Aspeed SMC controller to test our
SPI-NOR flash support. Reflect this dependency by changing the name.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Message-Id: <20210407171637.777743-17-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This adds a test for the Aspeed Hash and Crypto (HACE) engine. It tests
the currently implemented behavior of the hash functionality.
The tests are similar, but are cut/pasted instead of broken out into a
common function so the assert machinery produces useful output when a
test fails.
Co-developed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Co-developed-by: Klaus Heinrich Kiwi <klaus@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Klaus Heinrich Kiwi <klaus@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Message-Id: <20210409000253.1475587-4-joel@jms.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
QAPI patches patches for 2021-04-30
# gpg: Signature made Fri 30 Apr 2021 12:42:32 BST
# gpg: using RSA key 354BC8B3D7EB2A6B68674E5F3870B400EB918653
# gpg: issuer "armbru@redhat.com"
# gpg: Good signature from "Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>" [full]
# gpg: aka "Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>" [full]
# Primary key fingerprint: 354B C8B3 D7EB 2A6B 6867 4E5F 3870 B400 EB91 8653
* remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qapi-2021-04-30: (25 commits)
qapi/error.py: enable mypy checks
qapi/error: Add type hints
qapi/error.py: enable pylint checks
qapi/error.py: move QAPIParseError to parser.py
qapi/error: assert QAPISourceInfo is not None
qapi/error: Make QAPISourceError 'col' parameter optional
qapi/error: Use Python3-style super()
qapi/error: Repurpose QAPIError as an abstract base exception class
qapi/expr: Update authorship and copyright information
qapi/expr.py: Use tuples instead of lists for static data
qapi/expr.py: Add docstrings
qapi/expr: Only explicitly prohibit 'Kind' nor 'List' for type names
qapi/expr.py: enable pylint checks
qapi/expr.py: Remove single-letter variable
qapi/expr.py: Consolidate check_if_str calls in check_if
qapi/expr.py: add type hint annotations
qapi/expr.py: Modify check_keys to accept any Collection
qapi/expr.py: Add casts in a few select cases
qapi/expr.py: Check type of union and alternate 'data' member
qapi/expr.py: move string check upwards in check_type
...
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Prior to this commit, specifying a non-object value here causes the QAPI
parser to crash in expr.py with a stack trace with (likely) an
AttributeError when we attempt to call that value's items() method.
This member needs to be an object (Dict), and not anything else. Add a
check for this with a nicer error message, and formalize that check with
new test cases that exercise that error.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210421182032.3521476-8-jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Now, bdrv_node_check_perm() is called only with fresh cumulative
permissions, so its actually "refresh_perm".
Move permission calculation to the function. Also, drop unreachable
error message and rewrite the remaining one to be more generic (as now
we don't know which node is added and which was already here).
Add also Virtuozzo copyright, as big work is done at this point.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-37-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We don't need this workaround anymore: bdrv_append is already smart
enough and we can use new bdrv_drop_filter().
This commit efficiently reverts also recent 705dde27c6, which
checked .active on io path. Still it said that the problem should be
theoretical. And the logic of filter removement is changed anyway.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-25-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_append is not very good for inserting filters: it does extra
permission update as part of bdrv_set_backing_hd(). During this update
filter may conflict with other parents of top_bs.
Instead, let's first do all graph modifications and after it update
permissions.
append-greedy-filter test-case in test-bdrv-graph-mod is now works, so
move it out of debug option.
Note: bdrv_append() is still only works for backing-child based
filters. It's something to improve later.
Note2: we use the fact that bdrv_append() is used to append new nodes,
without backing child, so we don't need frozen check and inherits_from
logic from bdrv_set_backing_hd().
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-22-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Split out no-perm part of bdrv_root_attach_child() into separate
transaction action. bdrv_root_attach_child() now moves to new
permission update paradigm: first update graph relations then update
permissions.
qsd-jobs test output updated. Seems now permission update goes in
another order. Still, the test comment say that we only want to check
that command doesn't crash, and it's still so.
Error message is a bit misleading as it looks like job was added first.
But actually in new paradigm of graph update we can't distinguish such
things. We should update the error message, but let's not do it now.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-19-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
inore_children thing doesn't help to track all propagated permissions
of children we want to ignore. The simplest way to correctly update
permissions is update graph first and then do permission update. In
this case we just referesh permissions for the whole subgraph (in
topological-sort defined order) and everything is correctly calculated
automatically without any ignore_children.
So, refactor bdrv_replace_node_common to first do graph update and then
refresh the permissions.
Test test_parallel_exclusive_write() now pass, so move it out of
debugging "if".
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-18-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Rewrite bdrv_check_perm(), bdrv_abort_perm_update() and bdrv_set_perm()
to update nodes in topological sort order instead of simple DFS. With
topologically sorted nodes, we update a node only when all its parents
already updated. With DFS it's not so.
Consider the following example:
A -+
| |
| v
| B
| |
v |
C<-+
A is parent for B and C, B is parent for C.
Obviously, to update permissions, we should go in order A B C, so, when
we update C, all parent permissions already updated. But with current
approach (simple recursion) we can update in sequence A C B C (C is
updated twice). On first update of C, we consider old B permissions, so
doing wrong thing. If it succeed, all is OK, on second C update we will
finish with correct graph. But if the wrong thing failed, we break the
whole process for no reason (it's possible that updated B permission
will be less strict, but we will never check it).
Also new approach gives a way to simultaneously and correctly update
several nodes, we just need to run bdrv_topological_dfs() several times
to add all nodes and their subtrees into one topologically sorted list
(next patch will update bdrv_replace_node() in this manner).
Test test_parallel_perm_update() is now passing, so move it out of
debugging "if".
We also need to support ignore_children in
bdrv_parent_perms_conflict()
For test 283 order of conflicting parents check is changed.
Note also that in bdrv_check_perm() we don't check for parents conflict
at root bs, as we may be in the middle of permission update in
bdrv_reopen_multiple(). bdrv_reopen_multiple() will be updated soon.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-14-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
We have too much comments for this feature. It seems better just don't
do it. Most of real users (tests don't count) have to create additional
reference.
Drop also comment in external_snapshot_prepare:
- bdrv_append doesn't "remove" old bs in common sense, it sounds
strange
- the fact that bdrv_append can fail is obvious from the context
- the fact that we must rollback all changes in transaction abort is
known (it's the direct role of abort)
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-5-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
bdrv_append() is not quite good for inserting filters: it does extra
permission update in intermediate state, where filter get it filtered
child but is not yet replace it in a backing chain.
Some filters (for example backup-top) may want permissions even when
have no parents. And described intermediate state becomes invalid.
That's (half a) reason, why we need "inactive" state for backup-top
filter.
bdrv_append() will be improved later, now let's add a unit test.
Now test fails, so it runs only with -d flag. To run do
./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/append-greedy-filter
from <build-directory>/tests.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-4-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Add test to show that simple DFS recursion order is not correct for
permission update. Correct order is topological-sort order, which will
be introduced later.
Consider the block driver which has two filter children: one active
with exclusive write access and one inactive with no specific
permissions.
And, these two children has a common base child, like this:
┌─────┐ ┌──────┐
│ fl2 │ ◀── │ top │
└─────┘ └──────┘
│ │
│ │ w
│ ▼
│ ┌──────┐
│ │ fl1 │
│ └──────┘
│ │
│ │ w
│ ▼
│ ┌──────┐
└───────▶ │ base │
└──────┘
So, exclusive write is propagated.
Assume, we want to make fl2 active instead of fl1.
So, we set some option for top driver and do permission update.
If permission update (remember, it's DFS) goes first through
top->fl1->base branch it will succeed: it firstly drop exclusive write
permissions and than apply them for another BdrvChildren.
But if permission update goes first through top->fl2->base branch it
will fail, as when we try to update fl2->base child, old not yet
updated fl1->base child will be in conflict.
Now test fails, so it runs only with -d flag. To run do
./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-perm-update
from <build-directory>/tests.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Add the test that shows that concept of ignore_children is incomplete.
Actually, when we want to update something, ignoring permission of some
existing BdrvChild, we should ignore also the propagated effect of this
child to the other children. But that's not done. Better approach
(update permissions on already updated graph) will be implemented
later.
Now the test fails, so it's added with -d argument to not break make
check.
Test fails with
"Conflicts with use by fl1 as 'backing', which does not allow 'write' on base"
because when updating permissions we can ignore original top->fl1
BdrvChild. But we don't ignore exclusive write permission in fl1->base
BdrvChild, which is propagated. Correct thing to do is make graph
change first and then do permission update from the top node.
To run test do
./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-exclusive-write
from <build-directory>/tests.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Using mprotect() to change PROT_* does not change the MAP_ANON
previously set with mmap(). Our linux-user version of MTE only
works with MAP_ANON pages, so losing PAGE_ANON caused MTE to
stop working.
Reported-by: Stephen Long <steplong@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Just demonstrate one of x-blockdev-reopen usecases. We can't simply
remove persistent bitmap from RO node (for example from backing file),
as we need to remove it from the image too. So, we should reopen the
node first.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20210401161522.8001-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
# gpg: Signature made Thu 08 Apr 2021 10:34:24 BST
# gpg: using RSA key EF04965B398D6211
# gpg: Good signature from "Jason Wang (Jason Wang on RedHat) <jasowang@redhat.com>" [marginal]
# gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with sufficiently trusted signatures!
# gpg: It is not certain that the signature belongs to the owner.
# Primary key fingerprint: 215D 46F4 8246 689E C77F 3562 EF04 965B 398D 6211
* remotes/jasowang/tags/net-pull-request:
tap-win32: correctly recycle buffers
Revert "qapi: net: Add query-netdev command"
Revert "tests: Add tests for query-netdev command"
Revert "net: Move NetClientState.info_str to dynamic allocations"
Revert "hmp: Use QAPI NetdevInfo in hmp_info_network"
Revert "net: Do not fill legacy info_str for backends"
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
V2 migration+virtiofs fixes pull 2021-04-07
A seg fix in virtiofsd, a bunch of fixes for background snapshots, and
a migration test fix.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
v2
Fix for !linux build
# gpg: Signature made Wed 07 Apr 2021 18:53:13 BST
# gpg: using RSA key 45F5C71B4A0CB7FB977A9FA90516331EBC5BFDE7
# gpg: Good signature from "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (RH2) <dgilbert@redhat.com>" [full]
# Primary key fingerprint: 45F5 C71B 4A0C B7FB 977A 9FA9 0516 331E BC5B FDE7
* remotes/dgilbert/tags/pull-migration-20210407b:
tests/migration: fix parameter of auto-converge migration
migration: Rename 'bs' to 'block' in background snapshot code
migration: Pre-fault memory before starting background snasphot
migration: Inhibit virtio-balloon for the duration of background snapshot
migration: Fix missing qemu_fflush() on buffer file in bg_migration_thread
virtiofsd: Fix security.capability comparison
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Testing updates:
- fix x86_64 cross compilers
- don't use registry for non-x86 containers
- add valid host types for given cross compile containers
- clean up i386 code16 test with explicit -no-pie
- relax sha1.py gdbstub test
- add more gdbstub documentation
- remove annoying warning on gitlab
- test dtrace backend in gitlab
# gpg: Signature made Tue 06 Apr 2021 15:55:53 BST
# gpg: using RSA key 6685AE99E75167BCAFC8DF35FBD0DB095A9E2A44
# gpg: Good signature from "Alex Bennée (Master Work Key) <alex.bennee@linaro.org>" [full]
# Primary key fingerprint: 6685 AE99 E751 67BC AFC8 DF35 FBD0 DB09 5A9E 2A44
* remotes/stsquad/tags/pull-6.0-rc2-fixes-060421-1:
gitlab-ci.yml: Test the dtrace backend in one of the jobs
gitlab-ci.yml: Fix the filtering for the git submodules
docs/system/gdb.rst: Document how to debug multicore machines
docs/system/gdb.rst: Add some more heading structure
tests/tcg: relax the next step precision of the gdb sha1 test
tests/tcg/i386: force -fno-pie for test-i386
tests/tcg/i386: expand .data sections for system tests
tests/tcg/configure.sh: make sure we pick up x86_64 cross compilers
tests/tcg: add concept of container_hosts
tests/docker: don't set DOCKER_REGISTRY on non-x86_64
tests/tcg: update the defaults for x86 compilers
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Several issues has been reported for query-netdev series. Consider
it's late in the rc, this reverts commit
3c3b656885.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
when execute the following test command:
$ ./guestperf-batch.py --auto-converge \
--auto-converge-step {percent} ...
test aborts and error message be throwed as the following:
"Parameter 'x-cpu-throttle-increment' is unexpected"
The reason is that 'x-cpu-throttle-increment' has been
deprecated and 'cpu-throttle-increment' was introduced
Since v2.7. Use the new parameter instead.
Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
Message-Id: <0195d34a317ce3cc417b3efd275e30cad35a7618.1616513998.git.huangy81@chinatelecom.cn>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Depending on the version of gdb we may not execute the first line of
SHA1Init when executing the first "next" command - instead just
stepping over the preamble. As we don't actually care about the
position of the PC after the steps and want to be sure the
context->state[] has been loaded before we inspect it do a double next
at the start.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210401102530.12030-8-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
The containerised compiler defaults to no-pie anyway but if we are
relying on the users installed cross compiler we need to check it
works for building 16 bit code first.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210401102530.12030-7-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
While docker is nominally multiarch these days it doesn't mean our
distros actually package all cross compilers for all architectures.
The upcoming Debian bullseye release will improve things further. At
least for now we can get things like the 32 bit ARM compiler on it's
64 bit cousin.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20210401102530.12030-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
