build: move COLO under CONFIG_REPLICATION

We don't allow to use x-colo capability when replication is not
configured. So, no reason to build COLO when replication is disabled,
it's unusable in this case.

Note also that the check in migrate_caps_check() is not the only
restriction: some functions in migration/colo.c will just abort if
called with not defined CONFIG_REPLICATION, for example:

    migration_iteration_finish()
       case MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO:
           migrate_start_colo_process()
               colo_process_checkpoint()
                   abort()

It could probably make sense to have possibility to enable COLO without
REPLICATION, but this requires deeper audit of colo & replication code,
which may be done later if needed.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dave@treblig.org>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230428194928.1426370-4-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2023-04-28 22:49:21 +03:00
committed by Juan Quintela
parent 4332ffcd7b
commit 51e47cf860
8 changed files with 60 additions and 33 deletions

View File

@ -1052,6 +1052,7 @@ SRST
migration (or once already in postcopy).
ERST
#ifdef CONFIG_REPLICATION
{
.name = "x_colo_lost_heartbeat",
.args_type = "",
@ -1060,6 +1061,7 @@ ERST
"a failover or takeover is needed.",
.cmd = hmp_x_colo_lost_heartbeat,
},
#endif
SRST
``x_colo_lost_heartbeat``